My friend David
Wesley Gould posted this statement on his Facebook page: “In our belief
system, when the negotiable becomes non-negotiable, it won't be long before the
non-negotiable becomes negotiable.” I thought it was an interesting statement, and
since David and I come from very different denominational backgrounds, I wanted
to hear the rest of the story. I asked David to give me the context that his statement
emerged from.
David went on to explain that he had been involved in a
fairly vigorous online conversation with some colleagues from his denomination
about the role of women in ministry. His denomination ordains women for any
office, a practice that David thinks
should be done with great care and not just to be avant garde. The denomination is
officially egalitarian, but since most of their churches would never hire a
female pastor, David believes they functionally fall into the complementarianism
category. But this post is not actually about women in ministry. What it is
really about is how churches, and sometimes whole denominations, can get their
focus off course on what is really important, which is what led to David’s
comment about what is negotiable and what is non-negotiable. Let me explain.
David shared how in the course of the conversation, one
person declared that women in leadership is a “cornerstone” of the
denomination, and “not up for debate.” David recalls that “Others began to jump
in, and suddenly, people were saying that woman’s ordination was one of our
core beliefs.” While it is clearly an important issue, regardless of which side
of the debate we fall on, is it really a cornerstone of the denomination? It is
really a core belief? Since I am not part of David’s denomination, I do not
know for sure, but somehow, I would think that the Gospel should be the
cornerstone of ANY denomination, more than the gender of the pastor.
What David found interesting about the discussion he took
part in is that at the same time that this discussion about women in ministry was
going on, there was also discussion by some in the denomination that they
should open the door for those who would see the Bible (primarily the Old
Testament) as merely a story-telling narrative, compiled from various writers
who may or may not have been giving historical accounts, but certainly wove in
their own cultural stories into the main story. David concludes that “basically
the inerrancy of Scripture is on the table for review and dismissal
(negotiable), but allowing women to pastor is now an essential (non-negotiable)
doctrine.” David sees that as a real problem, and made the statement on his
Facebook page to express his frustration. I find myself in agreement with
David’s concern.
What we decide is negotiable, or non-negotiable, really is
important. If we focus on the wrong things and make them non-negotiable, we may
find ourselves fighting for a cause that in the end does not make a significant
or eternal difference. (For the record, I believe that God reserves the office
of pastor for males who meet the biblical qualifications, but that belief is
not a “cornerstone” of my faith.) On the other hand, if we give up the fight on
issues that are indeed crucial to our faith, then in the end, we will lack the
ability to make a significant or eternal difference because we will no longer
be teaching the truth. Lord, help us know which issues are truly the
cornerstones of our faith and which issues are perhaps important, but secondary.
No comments:
Post a Comment